China mustresist multiparty systems,separation of powers& erroneous democracy

Please kindly explain to me why any Taiwanese, including KMT faithfuls, could support a handful of KMT elites who would like to cede Taiwan to China. See what it means for Taiwan to be part of China:

"Erroneous" Western democracy not for China says official

Reuters

Published: January 18, 2009

BEIJING: China must build defences against "erroneous" ideas involving Western-style democracy, a top government official said in comments published on Sunday, shooting down recent calls by dissidents for political reform.

China's ruling Communist Party has stepped up efforts to stifle dissent and protest ahead of politically sensitive anniversaries this year, and amid concerns that rising unemployment in a slowing economy could fuel broad social unrest.

Jia Qinglin, China's fourth-most senior official, demanded officials throw their weight behind the one-party state in an essay in the Party's main ideological journal "Seeking Truth" (Qiushi), which was reproduced on major web portals on Sunday.

"Build a line of defence to resist Western two-party and multi-party systems, bicameral legislature, the separation of powers and other kinds of erroneous ideological interferences," said Jia, who is also head of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), a largely toothless parliamentary advisory body.

"Consciously abide by the Party's political discipline and resolutely safeguard the Party's centralised unity," Jia said, calling on CPPCC members to strengthen "ideological unity."

The essay comes weeks after hundreds of scholars, dissidents and former Party officials signed "Charter 08," a petition campaign calling for open democratic elections and an independent judiciary.

Authorities have since detained prominent Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo and other rights activists over the manifesto, and earlier this month launched a crackdown on Internet pornography and other "vulgar" online content.

China's Communist Party leadership faces a number of politically sensitive anniversaries this year, including the 20th anniversary of the brutal crushing of student-led pro-democracy protests centred on Tiananmen Square in June, 1989.

(Reporting by Ian Ransom; Editing by Valerie Lee)

KMT does not honor fairness

In A return to dark days in Taiwan, Stephen A Nelson quoted Taiwan News:

if the KMT loses based on the existing game rules, it ceases to follow the rules or rewrites the rule book.

An analogy: when KMT is losing a baseball game, it changes the rule by making the game last as long as it needs to win and by changing empire who will call a ball a strike and a strike a ball.

This is one reason we cannot compete with KMT, which has authority on game rules and change them as it wish. We need to put our heads together to find ways to defeat such evil that would not even honor fairness. This is why I create this community blog. Please join us to come up with a plan, if at all possible, before it is all too late.